Blogwanking and Social Media Sunday and Long-Term Strategy, OH MY!

I’ve gotten out of sync with the quarterly stat sharing. I discussed April at the end of A to Z, but I never looked at the entire second quarter, and now we’re through July. I’m discussing the past three months today. Y’all can just deal with the fact that this is 2500 words and has very little art. Read it if you want to up your game. Learn something.

Quarterly Stats

Here’s where we are with Sourcerer.

stats_src_15_08_06After the April we had here, I knew we had to come back to earth in May. I would like to have remained above 3,400 total views for the month, but I’ll take 104 average views per day for this blog and be happy with it any month of the year if that’s all I can get. It was an improvement over last May, so good — one of the things I look at with the stats is same-month comparisons from year to year.

Then June hit us, and as you can see, it hit us pretty hard. It was the first month of the year we didn’t see an improvement over 2014. There are reasons for that, and the effect carried into July. I’m hoping we’ll at least be able to do better than we did last year in August, and that’s entirely possible since these screenshots were taken on the 6th and we already had almost 500 views for the month.

The downturn in June was entirely predictable. I’d hoped it wouldn’t be quite that bad, and that we could contain it to a single month. But oh, well. We’re bloggers. We deal. It started in May, really. Once we all had A to Z in the bag, many of the regular contributors here spent some of their blogging time in April and May stockpiling content to get Comparative Geeks through the arrival of Geek Baby. And this emphatically is not a complaint. I volunteered for it, actively encouraged it, and Diana and I pitched in some posts of our own. David and Holly are our friends, if you haven’t realized. We’d be pretty sad around here if CompGeeks went silent.

But this group of content-producers we’ve assembled only looks big from the outside. It’s a small group, and nearly everyone has their own blogs. I made a calculated decision to do as much as I could to ensure CompGeeks didn’t have to go dark for any significant period of time, no matter what it cost Sourcerer. That decision was worth it and I’d do it again, but it meant our planning for late summer suffered, and we all had less to offer Sourcerer in June because we gave a lot of our writing-ahead time to CG in April and May.

All this came to a head at the beginning of the worst single month I’ve had, offline-wise, in years. I relocated my family the first weekend of June and the move turned into a never-ending disaster. There was a car accident that had to be dealt with, and a death in my family the weekend of July 4. This meant I didn’t have the means to cover the blog myself, and I wasn’t good asking contributors to just run the blog while I was basically off the internet for several weeks, because they were in the middle of doing the same for another blog, and they had threads to mind at CompGeeks.

This translated into more missed days in late June and early July than we’ve had since we started. It meant I wasn’t around to chatter and work my WordPress reader to keep the blog on peoples’ radars. It also meant photo features had to be suspended. That is costing us two posts a week, every week. Those still aren’t back. I’m working on it, but they aren’t coming back until I can do them consistently, so, might be awhile yet. Irons in the fire and all that.

The thing about the photo features is this: They’re great for likes and getting into the feeds an extra time. They’re better than nothing, and sometimes good for generating conversations. But I am not actually sure they get us any page views. They are always the first thing I cut when times get tough, and the last thing I bring back when times are good. Afternoon photoblogging here means we’re feeling prosperous.

So, June/July was entirely predictable — partially the result of conscious decisions about where to focus contributors’ content. Partly about me not being able to be present here due to unforseen circumstances. It’s not a concern, and we’re still on track to do better than we did in 2014. If we can end the year north of 100 average daily views, I’ll be happy with our progress in 2015.

Far as referrals go. The quarterly summaries are rolling averages and I didn’t pull them at the end of July. But in general, the traffic’s coming from the same places it always has: Search engines, the WordPress reader, Twitter, and Facebook. In that order. Search engines are by far the largest source — the only source that’s gotten us a four-digit number over the last 90 days. Our referrals from the reader and Twitter are way down, because I’ve not had time to spend on other WordPress blogs, nor to tweet properly, for most of the summer.

Our most popular posts in the last 90 days, aside from two or three Batman and Penny Dreadful posts that account for 85 percent of our search traffic, are the Geek and Greet blog party post; Rebecca Bradley’s Disclaimer review, which got Google traffic on the official release day; one of Hannah’s Ms. Marvel posts; one of Rose’s She-Ra posts; and my recent interview with Gretchen Kelly.

Now take a look at the recently-redesigned and better-than-ever Part Time Monster.

stats_ptm_15_08_06

I’m proud of the progress Diana is making with this blog. It just keeps getting better. The decrease from April to May is entirely the post-A to Z effect, I think. June was comparable to last June, and I don’t know what happened over there in July, because I was too busy to be paying attention. But I will say. A lot of people seem to have had down months in July. Since she’s on track to have a good August, I’m not concerned about July and I’m looking at it as an outlier.

If you compare our total page views for the year, you’ll see that PTM is about 4K ahead of Sourcerer. You’ll recall that for most of the time we’ve been doing this, our two blogs have run neck-in-neck. I’ve thought many times that PTM was going to surpass us here for well and good, but we’ve generally stayed within 1K of one another. Those days are over now, I think.

The Monster is in a position to consistently generate at least 500 more views than Sourcerer every month from the #WeekendCoffeeShare linkup alone. Monster Mondays, a feature Diana developed from her A to Z theme, have been well-received, too, and those posts tend to be uber-shareable. Throw in the Top Ten Tuesday traffic, and the Monster’s just better for attracting a consistent number of readers week-in and week-out.

None of this is a complaint, and it’s got nothing to do with the quality of the posts we publish here at Sourcerer. Our contributors are a collection of some of the best bloggers WordPress has to offer. We set this whole thing up with the idea that if these blogs were going to break out, the Monster would be the one to break out first. So, our evil schemes are going as planned, and I’m getting a LOT of satisfaction out of having been the chief architect of the whole thing.Even_More_Evil_Plotting_Raccoon_Quickmeme_by_GeneO

The Monster’s top referrers for the quarter are the same as Sourcerer’s. It’s getting a little less search traffic, but more from the reader, a comparable number from Twitter, and more from Facebook. The Monster’s always gotten more from Facebook. Both blogs are seeing a slight uptick in referrals from other blogs — we’re talking about maybe 25 or 30 per quarter each from a handful of blogs. But the handful is growing, and in January, those 25s and 30s were more like 10s and 15s. That’s a good sign — it’s an indicator that we’ve made the right call by prioritizing network depth and engagement over traffic.

Part Time Monster’s four most popular posts are the Princess Bride and Giving Tree reviews, one of Jeremy’s Tough Ladies posts, and the Evil Queen from A to Z. Aside from a post about sexual violence in television, PTM’s most popular posts list is otherwise dominated by Weekend Coffee Share linkups. Search engines and the linkup are driving Diana’s traffic, because all the most popular posts other than the coffee posts were written weeks or months ago.

What It All Means

First, Diana and I aren’t running a race against each other with these blogs. The very idea of that would just get a “WTF?” from us. We don’t compete, ever. Not even in half-serious ways just to draw a crowd.

We cooperate. We’re trying to help one another find readers and make friends, and we’re trying to get better at this. That’s what the sharing of these stats is about. So, here are a few thoughts on what we might learn from this latest phase of the PTM-Sourcerer blogging enterprise.

First, WordPress is more a social media network than a publishing platform. A post on a wordpress.com blog is basically a longer, prettier status update with outgoing links. This is important to note. Because one rule of social media networking that seems to be ironclad is if you aren’t interacting on a network consistently, as far as the rest of the world is concerned, you aren’t on that network.

Aside from the missed days and lack of photo features, the biggest reason Sourcerer suffered in June and July is because I’ve not been liking and commenting on other WordPress blogs for weeks, and I’m the one whose likes/comments point to this blog. In fact, I suspect my lack of engagement has hurt us more than the missed posts. Whatever else I do, long-term planning wise, I’ve got to prioritize engagement on WordPress to get the activity level back up here.

Second, Part Time Monster’s gearing up to be more successful than Sourcerer in the short term because Diana has advantages with her blog we don’t have here. We have advantages, too, but they’re different — the entire styles of these blogs and the way they’re run are different. They’re designed to compliment one another, assuredly and intentionally. But they are not cast from the same mold.

I don’t consider Part Time Monster to be a niche blog, but it has a more specific content focus than Sourcerer. PTM is about “books, girls, and monsters.” Our motto around here is “all pop culture, all the time,” with a little social media thrown in and as much smartassery as we think our readers will put up with. That’s a much broader focus, which means it’s more difficult to know what to expect from Sourcerer. This blog will surprise you on occasion, but aside from a Wednesday comics post and occasional Social Media Sundays, you just never know what you’re gonna get here — especially during periods where most of our contributors are wrapping up runs and either planning the next one or working on their own projects.

Another advantage the Monster has is the regular content tends to be more consistent. Because Sourcerer runs on contributions, and bloggers have to be able to come and go as they please, we tend to do short-ish runs and one-off posts: Movie reviews, tv series blogthroughs, things like that. Those are fun to write and do well when we have them, but they don’t provide much long-term stability or focus.

Then there’s the fact that Part Time Monster is set up as a personal blog that accepts contributions. Sourcerer, whatever it is, isn’t a personal blog. It’s set up for one purpose, and one purpose only: to publish contributed content as a way of encouraging a community to form around our blogs and help bloggers form lasting relationships. I provide as much as I can, but fundamentally, Sourcerer will live or die based on my ability to maintain a contributor base and keep other bloggers interested in publishing here. Not on my ability to produce five or six posts per week myself. If I ever reach the point that maintaining active contributors is untenable, I’ll shut it down, give all my content to PTM, CompGeeks, and a handful of friends, and point my WordPress account to the Monster to give Diana the benefit of my WordPress engagement.

Sourcerer’s advantage in all this is that we have more latitude to experiment here, the potential to attract a larger number of contributors, and the ability to generate impressive traffic spikes on occasion. But it sets us up for boom/bust cycles with content (and therefore with readers) until we attract a a few more bloggers to join the crew. There just aren’t quite enough of us here yet.

I’m nowhere near ready to call it a day at this point. We’re doing well. We’ll get through the year and have another awesome spring if things keep going the way they are. So no worries. Slow and steady wins the race.

What’s Next For Sourcerer?

I’ve already written one post that specifically outlines where I’d like to take this blog over the next year, and given the length of this one already, I’m not going to rehash it all here. But basically, we need a few regular things — things people can count on seeing at specific times of the week or month, and we need to do that in a way that allows room for contributors to join in when they feel like it.

I think moving the #WeekendCoffeeShare posts here will help. I’m also liking the Sci-Fi Saturdays. Those started as Star Wars Saturdays, but I think I like “Sci-Fi” better, because it allows us to write about more than one franchise on Saturdays. Other than that, I want to keep the interviews going and eventually do more than one a month, and I want to do more collabroative posting like Hannah’s and Melissa’s Age of Ultron review.

Aside from those things, I’ve got to bring the photos back, engage more with other bloggers on their blogs, and get back to Twitter. I’ve somewhat prioritized Facebook since last fall, and that’s paid off, but it’s come at the cost of WordPress and Twitter growth. I’ve done what I can on Facebook by spending large amounts of time there. I’m friends with enough bloggers now to be happy where I am, and I’m content with slow-and-steady progress driven by genuine interaction.

So, once we move into the fall, you’ll see less of me over there, but more of me in the blogosphere and on Twitter. Once I get back where I need to be with those two networks, my next big project — probably my big social media project for 2016, has to be cracking either Reddit or StumbleUpon. We’ve proven we can do engagement, and what we need at this point is big traffic. We’re getting all we can get by working for views in ones and twos. We need to figure out how to attract readers by the hundred through a single link, and one of those two networks is likely the shortest route to that.

This is quite enough for today. I hope at least a few of you find this helpful.

Advertisements

41 thoughts on “Blogwanking and Social Media Sunday and Long-Term Strategy, OH MY!

  1. As you know I think Reddit is a much easier SN than Stumble upon. In December I was able to generate 200 views per hour for one of my posts. So yea, I’ve not been on there much lately .. time is always an issue and for me it is more about actual interaction than views. I think most posts of Sorcerer would work well on Reddit. … let the evil scheming begin. 😉

    Liked by 2 people

    • My concern with Reddit has always been that it would take as much or more time to build a viable presence there as it has to get the Facebook where it is. And that is would basically suck away an equivalent amount of time to maintain as Facebook does.

      Liked by 1 person

        • Just so you know: The Batman got more over all, but the trajectory was different than the Tolkien. Has to do with how busy the SubReddits you chose for them were, I think.

          Both showed views quickly. The Batman hit harder, but burned out more quickly. The Tolkien was a more slow, steady thing. Still getting those today.

          Thanks for doing this. Got us three good days when we needed it, and I learned stuff about the traffic game. I’ll not forget it.

          Liked by 1 person

  2. My big secret appears to be reviewing children’s shows. Anything tagged REVIEW gets consistent long-tail traffic, and if its a kids’ show it’s going to last forever. I’m at the point where after the Snowpiercer review (who the shit is still Googling this movie? WHY WILL THIS POST NOT GO AWAY?) and the post that got Freshly Pressed, something like 7 of the next 10 all-time-best posts are from the Creepy Children’s Programming series. I don’t know why.

    Liked by 2 people

    • LOL??? Still going?

      Yeah. Numbers, dates, numbers, dates.

      Please, please please share the info to the best of your ability.

      I firmly believe we can learn to do traffic if we’re smart, and if we share the info.

      Liked by 2 people

  3. Yay! Stat-crunching! 🙂 I’ve been surprised, but my blog didn’t take much of a hit after April… lost about a 1,000 views/month since then, but that’s an uptick of about 2,000 since before April, so I guess I made a lot more longterm connections. Yay!

    The other thing that happened was my old post about the author/blogger scandal got a revival, since the author in question is publishing a new book (as silently as possible, since there are ears everywhere in the book blogging community). I have a feeling that amounted for a great deal of the traffic last month, when I missed two whole weeks of posts (yikes)! However, StumbleUpon is still a huge player for my views, having generated a whopping 2,300 in the last quarter alone (on one post).

    I think trying to focus on more Stumble-able content (non-aging content) and connecting with regional blogs (like Vancouver blogs, since I’ll be moving there soon) are my next plans of action. Freshly Pressed would also be nice…. but that relies a lot on luck and timing.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Yeah. Freshly Pressed is capricious. Lots of us (not Sourcerer, and not me, but lots of us) have been Freshly Pressed. I’ve studied that one a bit.

      Agree on the Stumble-able content. Just not sure what that looks like yet. But I want. I want to own StumbleUpon. Want it so badly I can taste it.

      Liked by 3 people

      • I’ve been browsing StumbleUpon for a while now, getting the feel of it and feel the best content is easily processed (tight wording), has the awe factor, or reveals something new to the world, typically through unique perspectives.

        Liked by 2 people

          • Wow, you actually found it? Haha. I need to thank whoever stumbled it last year. They probably accounted for 30% of my traffic overall. 😀

            Liked by 1 person

        • Interesting. I’ve not analyzed much beyond the very basics, like the sort of art that seems to be preferred and such as that.

          I’m continually struggling to make my own content more “easily-processed.” Not the easiest thing for a wordy essayist, but I’ve made a lot of progress with it since I started.

          Liked by 1 person

          • I understand. I still ramble and get wordy in my sentences. Working on it, too. But my photography is a huge draw to my blog, even though I’m no pro, so I’ll probably keep doing features.

            Liked by 1 person

            • As a person who pays attention and makes all kinds of judgments about photography skills, I have to say: Yours are excellent. You have a good eye, an image-rich environment, and seems like you also have good equipment. I’d keep those photos up, if I were you.

              Liked by 1 person

            • I have a basic camera. No lens changing. ^^; My trick is only to drop the exposure a bit to catch all the colors in the shot. But thank you very much for saying so. 🙂

              Liked by 2 people

  4. Since about 2000 words ago this was a big thing, I thought I should share this amazing collection of posts: https://comparativegeeks.wordpress.com/2015/06/22/encore-our-contributorsavengers-world/

    That’s all the contributions that got us through the hospital and the early weeks with the Geek Baby. Holly and I found the ability to blog again in large part because we weren’t trying to figure it out while also figuring out a newborn. A thank you to you and everyone who helped make that happen. There’s some really great stuff there, for anyone who hasn’t read them. I have them organized thematically!

    As to blog stats, I do have one interesting question. Does a person who has dashboard access leave any page views behind as they go along? In other words, does me reading here and now, me coming back to comment on threads… does that generate any traffic or views? I’m pretty sure the answer is no. Which means that as contributors have been added – many of whom are some of the most talkative folks here – the blog stats have nonetheless grown.

    I’ve been thinking about this lately because with the CG Baby Posts collection, a number of our best readers became contributors! So while it might hurt the stats, it also means you’re pulling in other folks, more folks, new folks!

    Liked by 3 people

    • Coming back to this. The whole not counting of the signed-in contributors. Sometimes good, sometimes bad.

      If a person does a few posts — or even a lot — but at some point, they’re never posting here again, I’d want their stats to count.

      With a blog like this one though, there’s great potential for stat inflation of the sort that generates noise and makes it a less effective internet-studying tool. Just for example. @mbarkersimpson is good about working her own threads every time she publishes. She’s not the only one who is good, but she really stands out in that regard.

      Melissa could inflate our stats badly while working her threads, from a strict information-gathering perspective. An active contributor who habitually works their threads is a wonderful ally to have, but their activity makes it harder to see how much audience we really got.

      And here’s the thing. If we were set up differently, contributors’ views would TOTALLY COUNT for things like pricing ad revenue. And they would lower our bounce rate while increasing our “on-site time per visitor.”

      But we can’t measure that stuff. This is a free WordPress blog that we can’t hook up the WebMaster tools we need sort it all out unless I pay for a business account.

      But I’m glad it’s not counting the crew most of the time, because these stat posts would be a lot less valuable if it did. The crew is not the audience.

      Thanks for collecting the Geek Baby arrival posts. Given the two months I just had, I missed a lot of that stuff. Good that it’s organized by theme, and I think that is a link we can do things with. I wondered if I was going too far up there, as I was writing this, but decided not.

      Liked by 2 people

    • One more here, and I am going to be so sad when this thread gets bumped off the front page. This occurred while I was driving home today.

      Even if this blog only exceeds last year’s views a little. Heck, even if it just breaks even, the improvement is larger than the stats indicate. Here’s why.

      In the early going, months and months of content were pasted in by me, because we didn’t have the social juice to do the shared dashboard thing. So, the contributors coming to check their threads, giving me advice on design, coming to grab the shared, etc. All counted.

      Our views/visitor ratio is going to be down at least half a point because we don’t have contributors with no access being measured three and four times a day any more. Jeremy was all over this blog with both computer and phone the first year, and most of the time, he was being counted as a visitor.

      I wonder what our stats would look like if the dozen of you active folk weren’t being excluded. I’m glad wordpress isn’t counting you, because accurate data. But I still wonder.

      You can see the views/visit thing clearly by comparing mine and Diana’s. The #WeekendCoffeeShare is keeping her above 2:1 from people checking the linkup several times every weekend. Imagine what her traffic would look like if everyone involved in that linkup was suddenly no longer counted.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. I’m entirely certain my lack of interaction on other blogs this year is what’s caused less interaction at TM… That, and I’ve been posting irregularly and not as well in my opinion. (I haven’t checked my stats, but you know, you can tell. Also I’ve found that not checking stats actually -makes the stats worse- somehow.) My schedule changes drastically at the end of this month, for the MUCH BETTER, and when it does, shit is GOING DOWN at TM. This I swear. *squinty Clint Eastwood serious face*

    Like

    • Ha! Squinty Clint Eastwood. Not sure why not checking them would make them worse. Seems like the same thing as not changing your socks before a game because you hit a home run in the last one. But from my experience with the other blog, the frequency is a large issue.

      Frequency will get you views. Interacting on other blogs will also get you views AND it gets the engagement.

      Posting often is probably the most important factor in the overall traffic, but there’s no substitute for regular likes and comments if you want people to talk to you. At least, none I’ve found so far.

      Like

      • It’s -not- checking that makes them worse. I feel like if I check them every day, they get better. (I assume it’s because checking them is an indicator of my overall attentiveness, and because I learn little tricks to help improve them if I’m paying attention. It’s just an easy rule of thumb for me that if I check them every day, they get better and better.)

        Frequency makes a huge difference overall. I can’t post every day, so consistency seems to be important as a kind of runner-up. People being able to anticipate what’s coming and check specifically for types of posts they’re expecting. I thought so already, but since I haven’t been doing that, I’m pretty sure.

        Liked by 1 person

        • My lightbulb moment is when I asked a way more successful internet person how often I should post on my blog and when. What they told me:

          “Often as you can, but if you can’t do it often, do it on the same day of the week.”

          Frequency, consistency, then content focus, is how I prioritize the posting on the blogs.

          Liked by 1 person

  6. July was a mess—-the whole year has been just a roller coaster ride, really. By July I’d been over-extending myself for months, and then we had a death in the family, and I changed jobs the day of the funeral, and after that I spent 3 weeks or so sleeping a lot and ignoring anything that wasn’t necessary for survival. I didn’t post as often during those weeks, and when I did it was less engaging material than normal. I’m surprised my stats didn’t suffer more in June, when I was actually over-extending myself.

    It already looks like August is going to be a better month. I bounced back to a regular posting schedule and made some changes I’d been wanting to make for a while. Part of the reason a sprung for a .com and a paid theme was that I wanted to give myself a treat! Now that I’ve got most of the pages and such built (I want to build one more page for blogathons I’ve participated in and guest posts I’ve written), and I’ve gotten myself on a regular work schedule that I can deal with, I’m ready to start writing posts for other people again and commenting more regularly on blogs I read. And working on October, which is going to be a fun month online and offline.

    Looking forward to writing about the Rat Queens on the day the new issue comes out next week. 😉

    Liked by 1 person

      • We do. And I know you know all that, but now it’s on the record, even if it’s buried in a comment. 😉

        I’m thinking what I may do with RQ is a general introduction and a note about the new issue coming out—yes?

        Liked by 1 person

  7. Pingback: Weekend Coffee Share: In Which My Motivation Fails | Sourcerer

Chatter Away!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s