Since I began blogging in November of 2013, I’ve written at least 25,000 words about the work of J.R.R. Tolkien. Most of those posts have been part of a long series devoted to analyzing the way various characters interact with the One Ring. Over the last year, I’ve looked at Isildur and Gollum, and I am working on Bilbo this year.
My basic reading of the One Ring, for purposes of this series, is that it is more than a mere appendage of Sauron or an intelligent artifact. It’s a character in its own right. I’ve identified passages which clearly demonstrate that:
- It has a will of its own. Its primary motivation is to return to its master, but it delights in betrayal and in instigating conflict between other characters – especially murderous conflict.
- It seems prescient at times, or at the very least, has a limited ability to see what’s going on in its immediate vicinity.
- Although it has no power of locomotion, it is able to manipulate its own weight and size, and to attract the attention of living creatures through a sort of empathic communication.
It is not necessary to read the Ring as a fully-formed character, but I think the texts – especially The Lord of the Rings, more than support that reading. The interactions between the Ring and the other characters are the key to understanding how good and evil function in Middle Earth. In fact, I like this reading so much, I might just write about the One Ring for the Great Villain Blogathon next year.
What you think? Is the Ring a character, or am I pushing the interpretation too far for the sake of some nerdy fun?
If you’re on the hunt for great Tolkien-related internet content, you might want to check out Sweating to Mordor, A Tolkienist’s Perspective, The Leather Library, and Middle Earth News. I follow them all and check in with them as often as I can. And do stop back by on April 23 to read what I have to say about the good professor himself.
Related articles
- Tolkien: A History of the Third Age in Bullet Points (sourcererblog.wordpress.com)
- Lord of the Rings: Tempted Mortals (sourcererblog.wordpress.com)
- 10 Memorable Fantasy Books and Series: Top Ten Tuesday (sourcererblog.wordpress.com)
Great post. Being a Tolkien fan I have to agree about the One Ring. It was just as much a character for the books as Bilbo, Frodo, and the others. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks! I am glad I’ve proven my point at least to one other persons’ satisfaction! The conversation about whether it’s a character or not has been fairly interesting at times.
LikeLiked by 2 people
You have made the case for me Gene’O. I say the ring is definitely a character in it’s own right. I really appreciate the new perspective you have given me. Time to re-read LOTR 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
I recommend the re-read for sure. I read them all at least every three years. Always find new stuff that I hadn’t noticed before when I do. The Tolkien is a deep well of ideas.
LikeLiked by 2 people
This statement: “Is the Ring a character, or am I pushing the interpretation too far for the sake of some nerdy fun?”… there is no such thing as too far when it comes to needy fun 🙂 I think you’re spot on, from my admittedly (and surprising ) lack of knowledge of LoTR.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Agreed. What good is life if we can’t have nerdy fun with it?
LikeLiked by 3 people
Not much good at all, I say. Thanks so much for reading!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Ha! Thanks! I agree about the nerdy fun.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My Precious ssssss!
LikeLiked by 3 people
LOL. Indeed!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh yes, I’m totally on board with your ring-as-character thesis. The word choices are pretty clear I think. So, at least Bilbo felt that way. 😉
LikeLiked by 4 people
Yeah. This is definitely a place where close reading is a valuable tool. Actually, one of the reasons I spent so much time on the verb choices and the construction of the narrator in the beginning is that I hope, at some point, to turn the Tolkien blogging into a useful example of close reading analysis to help people who are . . um . . English scholars understand what close reading is.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good plan!
LikeLike
The ring absolutely had a life of its own. When something is that symbolic and powerful, it deserves the reference of being a character. Thanks for sharing your thoughts so eloquently!
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re very welcome! And thanks for stopping by and reading the A to Z post. The idea that the ring is a character was a bit of a hard sell in the beginning. I’m a little surprised by the reactions to this post.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Not at all a stretch – not when you think of it’s significance. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Absolutely! The One Ring is a stand alone character in my mind. It is ever present with the way it interacts with the other characters. Especially the different ways it interacts with Gollum and Smeagol. The ring may be the only character who recognizes the creature as separate entities.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sam and Frodo recognize Gollum as two separate entities by the end, I think, but for most of the story, you are right. (I wrote several posts about Gollum last year and pulled him to pieces).
Love that username, btw. This blog is built on Batman and television.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks! That is what led me here was the review of The Killing Joke. I enjoyed that a lot.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love LOTR! Tolkien was a genius to come up with this story and world as well as the characters and yes…the one ring to rule them all. 🙂
-Chrys Fey
Tremp’s Troops – A to Z Co-co-host
Write with Fey
LikeLiked by 2 people
I agree! He’s absolutely my favorite author.
LikeLike
You’ll get no argument from me. After all, landscape can have such an impact upon a story that it is considered character. Why not a ring?
LikeLiked by 2 people
That is a very good point!
LikeLike
The ring was the reason for LotR’s existence. Without it the story would’ve been all about pissy elves, drunken dwarves, some evil dead creatures, and a bunch of sentient bunnies! 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
LOL. Sentient bunnies!
LikeLike
Now that is very interesting.
Great post.
Heather
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks very much! I’m glad you enjoyed it.
LikeLike
Oh, the Ring is absolutely a character. I know that the LOTR movies really wanted to give it that feel, too. I see it as a personification (as lust [lust for power, lust for material things, lust for long life, etc.]) on the same level with the Fates in mythology, or Death as grim reaper. The Ring’s presence is very real. Great post. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks! I had not considered it as a personification, but that makes a certain amount of sense.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I now want to read Neil Gaiman’s character personification of the One Ring.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Does this exist? Where?!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Only in my mind. Someone needs to message Neil Gaiman to get on it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hahaha. Yes, I agree with you. 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
His interpretation of the TARDIS was particularly spot on 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ever since I first read LOTR in the 1970s, I have felt that the One Ring has a life of its own. That seems to be a theme in a lot of old stories and myths – the artifact/object that changes the storyline itself. And of course Tolkien would have known many of those old tales.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Oh yes. He knew them all. Oxford Don with expertise in Germanic language and such.
Have you read his essay “Tree and Leaf?” it’s a non-fiction thing about how fairy tales work. If not, worth a read if you are into aesthetics or are a writer.
LikeLike
Tree and Leaf was one of the earliest works that I read – still got my copy, along with hardback LOTR copies. And I am a writer so suspect Tolkien has influenced me. Actually my first encounter with the Professor was through his academic writing – as I said in another comment. Cheers
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Blogging A to Z Day 23: Tolkien | Sourcerer
I do think that the Ring was a character, and its name was Sauron. I pretty much conflate the Ring and the Big Flaming Eye as the same being. Sort of.
LikeLike
Loves conflict…especially murderous conflict…love this.
🙂
Well put.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks! I got a little thrill when I wrote that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Ten Bloggers. 26 Blogging A to Z Posts. All on One Blog. | Sourcerer