What Dr. King did.

MLKpublicdomain

Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.
January 15, 1929 – April 4, 1968

I picked up this essay about Dr. King on Facebook yesterday, and something made me click through the link and read it. I am glad I did. It is a personal essay. I would copy and paste the whole thing if I could, but since I can’t, read this excerpt.

At this point, I would like to remind everyone exactly what Martin Luther King did, and it wasn’t that he “marched” or gave a great speech.

My father told me with a sort of cold fury, “Dr. King ended the terror of living in the south.”

Please let this sink in and and take my word and the word of my late father on this.  If you are a white person who has always lived in the U.S. and never under a brutal dictatorship, you probably don’t know what my father was talking about.

But this is what the great Dr. Martin Luther King accomplished.  Not that he marched, nor that he gave speeches.

He ended the terror of living as a black person, especially in the south.

I’m guessing that most of you, especially those having come fresh from seeing “The Help,” may not understand what this was all about.  But living in the south (and in parts of the mid west and in many ghettos of the north) was living under terrorism.

It wasn’t that black people had to use a separate drinking fountain or couldn’t sit at lunch counters, or had to sit in the back of the bus.

You really must disabuse yourself of this idea.  Lunch counters and buses were crucial symbolic planes of struggle that the civil rights movement decided to use to dramatize the issue, but the main suffering in the south did not come from our inability to drink from the same fountain, ride in the front of the bus or eat lunch at Woolworth’s.

It was that white people, mostly white men, occasionally went berserk, and grabbed random black people, usually men, and lynched them.  You all know about lynching.  But you may forget or not know that white people also randomly beat black people, and the black people could not fight back, for fear of even worse punishment.

This constant low level dread of atavistic violence is what kept the system running.  It made life miserable, stressful and terrifying for black people.

White people also occasionally tried black people, especially black men, for crimes for which they could not conceivably be guilty.  With the willing participation of white women, they often accused black men of “assault,” which could be anything from rape to not taking off one’s hat, to “reckless eyeballing.”

There’s nothing I can add to that, except to note that I grew up in the South, and I’ve talked to enough people about those times to know that this really is what life was like for a lot of people in those days. We need to remember it.

Here’s one more. It says more about the Civil Rights Movement  in 300 words than I could say in an entire book:

The question is, how did Dr. King do this — and of course, he didn’t do it alone.

(Of all the other civil rights leaders who helped Dr. King end this reign of terror, I think the most under appreciated is James Farmer, who founded the Congress of Racial Equality and was a leader of non-violent resistance, and taught the practices of non violent resistance.)

So what did they do?

They told us: — whatever you are most afraid of doing vis a vis white people, go do it.  Go ahead down to city hall and try to register to vote, even if they say no, even if they take your name down.

Go ahead sit at that lunch counter.  Sue the local school board.  All things that most black people would have said back then, without exaggeration, were stark raving insane and would get you killed.

If we do it all together, we’ll be OK.

They made black people experience the worst of the worst, collectively, that white people could dish out, and discover that it wasn’t that bad.  They taught black people how to take a beating — from the southern cops, from police dogs, from fire department hoses.  They actually coached young people how to crouch, cover their heads with their arms and take the beating.  They taught people how to go to jail, which terrified most decent people.

And you know what?  The worst of the worst, wasn’t that bad.

Once people had been beaten, had dogs sicked on them, had fire hoses sprayed on them, and been thrown in jail, you know what happened?

These magnificent young black people began singing freedom songs in jail.

That, my friends, is what ended the terrorism of the south.  Confronting your worst fears, living through it, and breaking out in a deep throated freedom song.  The jailers knew they had lost when they beat the crap out of these young Negroes and the jailed, beaten young people began to sing joyously, first in one town then in another.  This is what the writer, James Baldwin, captured like no other writer of the era.

Please let this sink in.  It wasn’t marches or speeches.  It was taking a severe beating, surviving and realizing that our fears were mostly illusory and that we were free.

When I was much younger, I regretted the fact that I was born too late to witness the Civil Rights Movement. I don’t feel that way now. I am white, and Southern. I’ve lived most of my life watching older people of different races, classes, and ideologies struggle to deal with the things they witnessed (and in some cases, things they did) during that time. I am glad I missed it, but I think it’s important to remember it, and remember it honestly. If you lived through the 50’s and 60’s in the South, you should think about writing your experiences down or look into giving an oral history.

If you only read one thing today, let it be this.

image: public domain via American Rhetoric

Advertisements

15 thoughts on “What Dr. King did.

  1. Reblogged this on Part Time Monster and commented:
    Today, I saw a Facebook conversation happening between some other white folks. It went like this:
    Status Updater: I want to talk with my 10 year old to the complex ideas of racism, the U.S. during the Jim Crow Era and Civil Rights Movement. What films/documentaries/etc. can you recommend?
    Commenters: A few helpful suggestions.
    Commenters: Let him be 10. Why force this on him so early? Why can’t we just let kids be kids?
    Commenters: But racism isn’t just about black and white.

    Like

    • Diana ended up deleting this reblog and turning it into a post, just so anyone who wanders by knows what happened. As a general rule, we don’t reblog one another anyway. This started as a reblog because we’re always having a conversation with one another – its just that our conversation is public, and conducted in the form of daily posts.

      Like

        • yeah, it is ugly. I kind of like having the memorial, though. I will think about it and figure out what the right thing to do is.

          So, do I need to add 1967-68 to my list of things to write about? And do I need to write some stuff about the importance of Nonviolence? I am sensing that there are many, many people in the world who do not understand what I mean when I capitalize it.

          Like

            • I cut most of it. I just cant bring myself to remove the entire fact that it started as a reblog from the archive, though. We have a process that we do not examine too closely, but I suspect there are other collaborative creatives in the world that would find it intensely interesting.

              Like

            • Probably. I find it pretty interesting myself, but I’ve no idea how to really analyze it. I’m too busy writing it. 🙂

              Like

  2. Great read! When the link took me to the original article, my eyes were restlessly looking for a name called Gandhi, and they found him. Gandhi’s philosophy of non-violence had greatly influenced the wonderful MLK Jr. Thanks!

    Like

    • Yw, and thanks for stopping by. Yes, Gandhi’s influence is well-documented. I discovered it for the first time in The Uncoquerable World, a book about the history of war and nonviolence by Jonathan Schell.

      Like

  3. I’ve seen some documentary pieces about nonviolent protests, and I was struck by their preparedness too. Preparedness to be arrested, to be beaten up by cops, to be attacked physically and verbally, to risk your job, to do without so many things.

    I wonder a lot how their example can be used now to address less public displays of racism, and also how it could apply to LGBT+ activism. It seems like there isn’t visible segregation to confront there, but more a legal question on a variety of tiers nationwide. The fear of lynching is still common for LGBT+ people, at least in the south, but there are other factors that make it different… I don’t really have any conclusions to draw right now.

    Like

    • The nonviolence was something they were taught. It was strict, and it was a calculated tactic – I am sure that can be proven. And I don’t mean that in a cynical way. They thought it would work, but they also felt that it was the best way to approach the situation, morally speaking. Dr. King studied Gandhi, and a much of the approach at the street-level was adapted from India. I am as unsure as you are about drawing any present-day conclusions. I do think it’s important to talk about this stuff, though, and personally, I’m thoroughly committed to nonviolence. It is one of the few things I refuse to compromise about.

      Like

  4. This is a great post. Racism is terrorism – exactly. Racism-based draggings and lynchings have occurred still, even in this our 21st century. I am glad you shared passages/links to the essay and your thoughts on this. I hope this leads to much open discussion, including more in our schools.

    Like

Chatter Away!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s